- Core inflation surprised lower for a second month
- Financial markets rejoiced as the dollar sank, yields fell, equities rallied and oil surged
- Another soft patch or the end of the great surge?
- US CPI, m/m % SA // y/y %, November:
- Actual: 0.1 / 7.1
- Scotia: 0.4 / 7.4
- Consensus: 0.3 / 7.3
- Prior: 0.4 / 7.7
- US core CPI, m/m % SA // y/y %, November:
- Actual: 0.2 / 6.0
- Scotia: 0.4 / 6.2
- Consensus: 0.3 / 6.1
- Prior: 0.3 / 6.3
Are we in just another soft patch or is the great inflation surge over and done with? Whatever the answer may be, the BLS may have made it back onto Santa’s nice list.
Time and patience will tell the answer to this question and markets rarely have both. For now, we have the two softest back-to-back months for US core CPI increases since September of last year before it began to take off again as omicron hit, fuller effects of damaged supply chains took root, pent-up services demand would later be released and the war in Ukraine struck. See chart 1. I retain my doubts given that the US economy remains in excess demand with a very hot labour market into an uncertain period for many prices over Winter and beyond. The details also showcase mixed readings including pockets of still elevated price increases that shouldn’t be ignored. The implications of change in China and the future developments around Ukraine are both big question marks. Coming basket weight changes in January CPI (due out in February) from 2019–20 biennial weights to 2021 spending weights also pose mild risk that may have added a couple of tenths or so to today’s year-over-year rate if applied now. It’s also probable that we remain at a highly nascent stage of developments in terms of revamping global supply chains in a process that will take years.
But spending too much time counselling caution on the back of figures like these is like standing in the middle of the track at the Indy 500 and wagging a finger at the cars to slow down. Markets didn’t hesitate to interpret 0.2% m/m core CPI as a dovish signal into tomorrow’s FOMC announcements as the USD sank, the two-year US Treasury yield rallied by 23bps at first and is retaining a drop of 16bps now in a 2s10s steepener move as the 10 year yield is down about 13bps on the day. Fed funds futures are pricing a terminal rate of around 4 ¾% and are pricing nearly 100bps of rate cuts by early 2024 if the policy rate does indeed peak at 5% into early 2023. That’s still a significantly restrictive policy rate path for quite a while yet so let’s not lose our heads here. US S&P500 equity futures instantly took off toward a nearly 3% gain but the cash market is now giving back almost all of that with a 0.8% gain so far on the day. Oil prices have moved nearly 4% higher. Some of this may be a violent unwinding of a positioning effect that was biased toward a higher number.
Nevertheless, this is the second consecutive downside surprise and a back-to-back big over-estimation by the Cleveland Fed’s 0.5% m/m nowcast whose allure is now significantly dented. I again over-estimated core CPI against a prior decent track record so own the accountability. There is considerable company within consensus since the only two to get it right out of 67 forecasters are ones I’ve personally never heard of, though perhaps that’s my deficiency.
DETAILS
So what caused it? Chart 2 shows that core goods prices did, while core service prices continue to climb fairly rapidly. Goods prices are more volatile and some big ticket items like autos drove much of this. So a first caution involves speculation toward whether service price inflation will remain hot as some goods prices temporarily benefit from easing supply chain pressures.
Chart 3 shows a breakdown of the month-over-month price changes in seasonally adjusted terms and chart 4 weights their contributions. Charts 5 and 6 do likewise for year-over-year changes.
There was softness in vehicle prices that dragged 0.1 percentage points off of headline inflation in weighted terms. This was driven by a 4.1% weight on 0% m/m change in new vehicle prices and a 3.7% weight on a 2.9% decline in used vehicle prices plus a 1.9% m/m drop in leased vehicles. It’s tempting to think this reflects rising financing costs and I’m sure it is to some extent, but the hit has been focused upon used vehicle prices and not new vehicles which is a bit curious from a relative affordability standpoint. Another possibility is that new vehicle backlogs are gradually easing and this is first showing up in continued declines in used vehicle prices that have for some time now lost their allure as an outlet for buying vehicles amid new vehicle shortages that have improved.
There was also a greater than seasonally normal amount of caution around holiday era travel that required discounting. That may reflect ongoing pandemic effects into the official start of the US holiday shopping and travel season. Airfare prices fell by 3% m/m. Vehicle rental prices were down 2.4%. Lodging rates slipped by 0.7%. Intercity bus fare fell by 1.6% m/m. People were still travelling, but needed enticements and deals in order to get the bookings up.
Medical care services fell by 0.7% m/m due to a 4.3% drop in health insurance for a second straight large drop and third one in the past four reports, and a drop in prices for eyeglasses and eye care clearly because some people out there don’t stare at their screens for most of their days.
Medical care commodities were up 0.2% m/m but prescription drug prices fell again by 0.2% m/m.
Energy prices fell by 1.6% m/m and knocked about 0.1 ppts off of headline CPI in month-over-month weighted contribution terms. That reflected a 2% m/m drop in seasonally adjusted gasoline prices but also lower natural gas prices and a slight drop in electricity prices. By definition this category didn’t explain core CPI.
There wasn’t much evidence of discounting around holiday shopping items or at least not enough to have much of a weighted effect which is the part of it all that I had expected versus greater than expected weakness in some other components. Apparel prices were up 0.2% m/m which went against the popular narrative that massive discounting due to bloated inventories was going on in that category, but the 2.5% weight makes this a trivial effect. Toy prices were down 1.4% m/m but only carry a 0.3% weight. Furniture prices fell 0.8% m/m with a weight of just under 1%. Video and audio product prices fell 1.2% m/m with just a 0.3% weight and captures TVs and audio equipment.
Beyond that, the rest of the components were pretty hot and so breadth was at best mixed. Owners’ equivalent rent was hot again at 0.7% m/m and may face lagging downward pressures into 2023 with the caveat on that argument being that market-based measures may be easing but are still much higher than previously and so folks transitioning toward new living arrangements through 2023 may still incur higher housing costs in terms of how CPI captures the effects for the average consumer.
Food prices were hot again (+0.5% m/m) with food-at-home (e.g. groceries) up 0.5% and food away-from-home (e.g. take-out, restaurants etc) also up 0.5% m/m.
Please also see the accompanying charts showing m/m price pressures for several key categories. Also see the accompanying detailed table with various measures including z-score deviations from norms and micro charts.
DISCLAIMER
This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.
These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.
Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.
Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.
This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.
™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.
Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.
Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.
Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.