PROVINCIAL BUDGET 2023 ROUNDUP
- Banking on last year’s windfalls, provinces experienced varying degrees of improvements in their bottom-lines, projecting a second consecutive year in collective surplus in FY23, followed by a small $6.9 bn deficit for FY24.
- With some newfound headroom, all provinces ramped up near-term spending, with a significant focus on healthcare. Fiscal stimulus winds down significantly.
- The provinces have generally taken a reasonable approach in their economic forecasting and budget planning, but many appeared somewhat complacent regarding potential downside risks of a more severe downturn.
- Provinces demonstrated prudence by setting aside about $12 bn as contingencies and provisions in FY24, followed by another $7.2 bn in FY25 and $8.2 bn in FY26, providing a sizeable buffer for a loss in revenues and additional spending needs associated with a plausible recession this year.
- Provinces’ borrowing requirements are expected to total $94 bn in FY24, up from $80 bn completed in FY23.
- Despite being pulled back by over 30%, the elevated levels of fiscal stimulus announced by the provinces still have a material impact on inflation and hinders the Bank of Canada’s ability to control it.
- Faced with increasing economic uncertainty, most provinces demonstrated relative spending discipline and prudent fiscal planning. Spending pressures associated with elevated inflation and record-high population growth have started to materialize, reflected in the provinces’ lifted spending profiles. We expect continued upward pressure on spending, particularly in the healthcare sector where the gap remains evident. Potential wage increases could also lead to meaningful surges in expenditures—the on-going public sector strike for instance, could serve as a precedent for other wage negotiations this year and next.
SECTION I. OVERVIEW
One prevalent theme in this year’s budget season is that unexpected inflation initially benefits budget planning but the positive effect diminishes quickly. Nominal GDP increases with inflation, while most government revenues are linked to nominal output, which combined leads to lower fiscal deficits and public debt as a ratio to output. However, as inflation becomes persistent and better anticipated, it no longer contributes to fiscal improvement and might negatively affect public finances through multiple channels, which will be the case this year. The central bank’s effort to restore price stability hampers growth prospects and hence brings down revenue growth. Spending pressures associated with persistently high inflation cannot be overlooked, particularly public wage growth, which has a direct and costly impact. Policy measures supporting the rising costs of living also erode provinces’ fiscal position of provinces.
As anticipated, provincial governments continued to revise their fiscal outlooks upwards, collectively projecting a second consecutive year in surplus in FY23, followed by a small $6.9 bn deficit in FY24 (-0.2% of GDP, chart 1). That is a material improvement from projections a year ago. All provinces saw improvements in their public finances relative to prior plans as higher prior-year tax collections provide a temporary boost to their revenues, but the positive impact is projected to dissipate rapidly. Alberta, Saskatchewan, and New Brunswick are on track to maintain surpluses in FY24. Ontario also slashed its deficit forecast and now expects a balanced budget next year (chart 2).
![Chart 1: Provincial Aggregate* Budget Balance; Chart 2: Provincial Budget Balance Projections](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image.img.png/1682479017658.png)
The combined net debt burden is expected to significantly reduce in FY23 and run at around 29% of GDP in the coming years—down from the almost 35% of GDP debt burden at the peak of COVID-19 spending. Despite the overall improvement in the debt burden and the combined stabilization of net debt as a share of output, some jurisdictions still face high and increasing levels of indebtedness (chart 3). Ontario is on track to run the largest debt burden across provinces in FY23, but sees it stabilize over the next three years. Newfoundland and Labrador is expected to carry the largest debt burden next year with a notable projected increase in net debt. In the medium-term, Nova Scotia’s debt share is projected to rise rapidly and surpass Quebec and Ontario next year. On the other hand, New Brunswick has made significant efforts to reduce its debt burden.
![Chart 3: Provincial Net Debt Projections](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1671203472.img.png/1682479037600.png)
Although debt burdens are projected to rise in some provinces in an environment of tight financial conditions, the adjustment of interest expenses should be gradual due to long-dated debt structures with average maturities well above 10 years (chart 4).
![Chart 4: Provincial Debt Servicing Costs](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1848793152.img.png/1682479058523.png)
SECTION II. REVENUE AND DOWNSIDE RISKS
As widely anticipated, most provinces expect revenue to stall or contract slightly in FY24, but they are building on strong base effects from last year’s windfalls (chart 5). Hence, despite downward revisions in economic forecasts of various magnitudes, this year’s revenues are still expected to be much stronger versus previous plans (chart 6), which improves budget balances and unlocks additional spending. Provinces that saw large windfalls in FY23 anticipate them to continue into the coming years. Alberta, BC, and Saskatchewan raised their respective FY24 revenue projections by over 10%, and even with the implementation of income tax cuts, Quebec still expects FY24 revenue to be 4% higher than in the last budget and in line with projected in its mid-year update.
![Chart 5: Provincial Revenue Growth Projections; Chart 6: FY24 Revenue Projection Improvement](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1739086174.img.png/1682479102816.png)
Provinces used reasonable economic assumptions, but most appeared sanguine regarding downside risks associated with mounting uncertainty in the near-term and the possibility of a more severe downturn. The sharp slowdown in real growth in 2023 is consistent across all provinces, albeit most are more optimistic than our forecasts (chart 7). Levels of prudence vary—Ontario is the most prudent, building its forecast on real growth assumptions of 0.2% and 1.3% for 2023 and 2024, respectively. However, its alternative scenario with a recession adds $3.7 bn and $6 bn more deficit to this year and next, delaying the path to balance to beyond FY26. Quebec’s updated fiscal path is based on optimistic economic assumptions, but the planning included an alternative scenario with a recession this year, which reduces its bottom line by $2.2 bn and $1.4 bn this year and next. A bumpier recover could bring further downside given the provinces’ cautiously optimistic stand—most provinces expect real growth to pick up next year, ranging from 1.1–1.6%, with Alberta and Newfoundland and Labrador both projecting even higher of real growth of 3% in 2023. All provinces have taken the consensus view on inflation and anticipate it to average above 3.5% in 2023, before returning back to the Bank of Canada’s target range in 2024.
![Chart 7: Real GDP Growth Assumptions](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_72174958.img.png/1682479118524.png)
Provinces expect above-trend population growth to remain a strong tailwind for growth in the coming years, after experiencing record growth in 2022 due to pandemic disruptions. Immigration is expected to continue expanding provinces’ tax base at a pace that is well above trend, particularly in the Maritime provinces, which project growth close to 2% in 2023. Alberta, BC, and Ontario are expected to remain popular destinations for international migration, with projected population growth of 2.9%, 2.4% and 1.7%, respectively.
Commodity prices pose potential risks to the outlook. Despite the slight pick-up in crude values after the announcement of planned cuts by the OPEC+ alliance, they have been facing headwinds from a highly uncertain economic outlook that could dent fuel demand. Alberta and Saskatchewan expect WTI price to average around 79 USD/bbl in FY24, which is slightly below the current price, but they remain optimistic about the pricing strength over the planning horizon. The near-term wild swings in oil prices suggest that these assumptions are not as conservative as the ones in the last budget, and the high sensitivity to oil prices could lead to material downside risks (Alberta’s budget links 1 USD/bbl with a net fiscal impact of $630 mn), though supply-side politics continue to represent a wildcard.
The four largest provinces incorporated significant levels of prudence through the use of contingency funds and forecast reserves (chart 8). Ontario included hefty contingencies of $5 bn in a standard forecast reserve along with some contingency funds under program spending—sufficient to absorb the downside risks in its recession scenario and would bring the province very close to a balanced book if some remain unused. Quebec and Alberta each included $1.5 bn forecast reserve for FY24, which is less than Ontario but still sizeable. BC has set aside $2.2 bn in contingency funds in anticipation of future public sector wage increases, in addition to $700 mn forecast allowance. Manitoba is the only other province that included contingencies, which amount to $200 mn.
![Chart 8: Projected FY24 Budget Balance](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_809397600.img.png/1682479139273.png)
SECTION III. SPENDING AND POLICY MEASURES
With these revenue windfalls, the provinces all ramped up near-term spending to varying degrees, with a significant focus on healthcare (chart 9). Overall, Ontario and Saskatchewan demonstrated most restraints in new spending, but their respective spending profile was nonetheless higher than outlined in last year’s budget, with Ontario’s increase mainly due to healthcare costs while Saskatchewan’s largely attributable to agriculture spending. On the other hand, BC and Alberta have both chosen to spend most of their sizeable revenue windfalls but with different priorities. Over 70% of BC's new spending will go towards improving the healthcare system and housing affordability, while Alberta's pre-election budget contains plenty of affordability support initiatives. Compared to FY23, most provinces anticipate continued growth in total spending this year, except for Saskatchewan, which expects some declines as its affordability measures subside.
![Chart 9: FY24 Revenue and Expenditures versus Budget 2022 Projections](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_798702704.img.png/1682479173388.png)
Provinces have made healthcare spending a top priority, employing varying strategies to address shared challenges related to hospital capacity, labour shortages, and backlogs. Ontario and BC allocated the highest percentage increases to healthcare spending among the larger provinces this year—at 8% and 13%—bringing per capita public healthcare spending closer to their peers (chart 10). Nova Scotia also dedicated major investments to fix its healthcare system following recent ER incidents due to long wait time. Although new healthcare expenditures were supported by federal-provincial healthcare agreements, the increase in near-term health spending far exceeded federal financial support. In Ontario, incremental healthcare investments were over three times the size of additional federal funding. Quebec had a similar pattern but to a lesser extent, while Alberta and BC presented their budgets without incorporating these agreements. As substantial new federal healthcare supports are unlikely in the near-term beyond what was announced earlier this year, provincial governments may have to shoulder most of the spending pressure to address the healthcare gap revealed during the pandemic.
![Chart 10: Healthcare Spending Per Capita Projections](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1876067154.img.png/1682479192016.png)
Despite the fact that most provinces have lifted their spending profiles and anticipate further growth this year, they generally rolled back on fiscal stimulus during this budget season (chart 11). Total stimulus was reduced by over 30% in FY24 compared to the size in FY23, primarily due to the time-limited measures in last year's plan, such as the one-time cheques. Quebec remains the province with the highest amount of affordability measures with its income tax cut for the two lowest income brackets, while Manitoba has also implemented tax relief by increasing its Basic Personal Amount. Alberta’s pre-election budget unsurprisingly announced broad-based affordability support highlighted by a PIT indexation measure and the continuation of fuel tax relief program. Despite the pullback, the impact of elevated levels of fiscal stimulus is still material—as noted by the Bank of Canada’s April Monetary Policy Report, the $25 bn per year in fiscal measures announced by provincial and federal governments add pressure on inflation through increased household spending and consumer demand.
![Chart 11: Affordability Measures](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1249431811.img.png/1682479215038.png)
Provinces continue to commit to high levels of infrastructure investments, collectively boosting planned capital spending by around 16% in FY24, partly as a result of project delays from the year prior (chart 12). BC and Ontario are aiming to raise capital spending per capita notably in the next two years by over 30%. Nova Scotia announced the largest single-year capital funding program in the province’s history, boosting per capital spending to levels above Ontario’s. Public infrastructure spending is crucial in facilitating long-term economic growth and help strengthen essential services, yet keeping pace on the capital spending might become increasingly challenging with chronic labour shortages, particularly in the construction sector.
![Chart 12: Capital Spending Per Capita](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_326767984.img.png/1682479231243.png)
SECTION IV. BORROWINGS AND CREDIT RATINGS
Planned total borrowings are $14 bn higher in FY24 than in the year prior, and are expected to remain high through FY26 (table 1). Increased supply could put upward pressure on provincial spreads, particularly for provinces such as BC and Quebec that saw the largest increase in financing needs. However, due to abundant contingency and allowances built in the budget and the possibility of capital project delays, borrowing requirements will likely come in lower over the course of the year. As a reference, the actual borrowing amount completed in FY23 was more than $20 bn lower than the planned amount in the previous budget.
![Table 1: Long-Term Borrowing Requirements $ billions](/content/experience-fragments/scotiabank/global_economics/en/fiscal_pulse/provincial-fiscal-roundup--2023-04-25-/master/_jcr_content/root/image_1156454006.img.png/1682479249108.png)
With recent financial market turmoil, renewed uncertainty, and widening risk spreads, there is little room for fiscal complacency. For instance, BC's credit rating was recently downgraded by S&P from 'AA+' to 'AA' and its outlook changed to negative as it embarked on substantial new spending that would see its debt levels increasing despite a relatively low starting position. While it was the only province holding the coveted AA+ status, it no doubt puts other provinces on alert for potential rating actions should fiscal positions not be calibrated to economic and financial conditions.
DISCLAIMER
This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.
These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.
Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.
Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.
This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.
™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.
Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.
Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.
Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.